User Tools

Site Tools


ci2010:team3:generalethics

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
ci2010:team3:generalethics [2010/02/21 21:31]
gmartine
ci2010:team3:generalethics [2010/02/24 15:11] (current)
Line 20: Line 20:
  
 As an example, if by killing someone everyone will be better off, an utilitarian would consider the killing as a good action, whether a deontological ethicist would consider the action wrong because it is wrong to kill, disregarding potential benefits to society. As an example, if by killing someone everyone will be better off, an utilitarian would consider the killing as a good action, whether a deontological ethicist would consider the action wrong because it is wrong to kill, disregarding potential benefits to society.
 +
 +{{:​ci2010:​team3:​200px-immanuel_kant_painted_portrait_.jpg|}}
 +Portrait of Immanuel Kant
  
  
Line 33: Line 36:
  
 Sets of duties dictate which groups we adhere to. If a group of friends share a set of duties that confront your own, you are likely to avoid such group. If an association has a set of duties to which you know you cannot adhere, you decide not to join. In general, different sets of duties determine our associations. ​ Sets of duties dictate which groups we adhere to. If a group of friends share a set of duties that confront your own, you are likely to avoid such group. If an association has a set of duties to which you know you cannot adhere, you decide not to join. In general, different sets of duties determine our associations. ​
 +====== Quotations ======
 +"Why not say [...] 'Let us do evil that good may result'?​ Their condemnation is deserved."​ -NIV Bible, Romans 5:8
 +
 +“Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.” -Immanuel Kant
  
-====== Excerpts (timinsert into other pages as well======+"Given our present perspectiveit is amazing that Christian ethics down through the centuries could have accepted almost unanimously the sententious doctrine that "the end does not justify the means." ​ We have to ask now, "If the end does not justify the means, what does?" ​ The answer is, obviously, "​Nothing!""​ - Joseph Fletcher, //Moral Responsibility//​ (1967)
  
-====== ​Classic and Modern ​Ethical Questions ​(examples of questions) (tim) ======+====== Ethical Questions ====== 
 +We don't give answers for these questions, and some of them may have no clear answer, but there are here to get you thinking.
  
 +  * Is it fair to charge more for technology in a developing country where it is more rare and in higher demand? ((Adapted from http://​ci2010-team1.blogspot.com/​2010/​02/​digital-divide.html))
 +  * How should we decide whether a piece of work should cost money, be free, or even be free and open source? ((Adapted from http://​ci2010-team2.blogspot.com/​2010/​02/​ethics-security-and-open-source-triple.html))
 +  * Is the best way to stay ahead of malicious hackers by hacking programs ourselves and posting the exploits for all to see?  Is this even an acceptable method? ​ ((Adapted from http://​ci2010-team2.blogspot.com/​2010/​01/​internet-return-to-wild-west.html and Professor Comer'​s opinion))
 +  * How much responsibility do public officials have when it comes to understanding the technology that they'​re selecting for their constituents?​ ((Adapted from http://​ci2010-team3.blogspot.com/​2010/​02/​voting-and-security-from-ethical.html))
 +  * What responsibilities do parents, teachers, and others have to educate children on Internet safety? ((Adapted from http://​ci2010-team4.blogspot.com/​2010/​01/​welcome.html))
 +  * When is web filtering a good or bad thing in schools? ((Adapted from http://​ci2010-team5.blogspot.com/​2010/​02/​digital-divide-outdated-or-updated.html))
ci2010/team3/generalethics.1266805897.txt.gz · Last modified: 2010/02/21 21:31 (external edit)