Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- references [2010/05/24 22:24]
Ninger Zhou
+++ references [2010/08/12 16:50] (current)
Chris Mayfield moved pdfs
@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 Armoni, M.: Looking at Secondary Teacher Preparation through the Lenses of Computer Science – a Literature Survey (in preparation)
+Astrachan, O. and Reed, D. 1995. AAA and CS 1: the applied apprenticeship approach to CS 1. SIGCSE Bull. 27, 1 (Mar. 1995), 1-5. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/199691.199694
+PDF:{{:project:methods:applied_apprenticeship_approach.pdf|}}
 Ball, D. (1989). Breaking with experience: The role of a preservice methods course. Retrieved on August 26, 2009 from http://ncrtl.msu.edu/issue.htm
@@ Line 24: / Line 27: @@
 Clancy, M., Stasko, J., Guzdial, M., Fincher, S. & Dale, N. (2001). Models and Areas for CS Education Research. Computer Science Education, 11(4), 323-341. doi:10.1076/csed.11.4.323.3827
+  * This paper surveys constructivism in the context of CSE, and shows how the theory can supply a theoretical basis for debating issues and evaluating proposals.
 Clear, T. (2004) Critical Enquiry on CS Education. In Fincher, S., & Petre, M. (Eds) Computer Science Education Research, London, UK: Taylor & Francis, 101-125.
 Cornwell, L.W.: Crisis in computer science education at the precollege level. In: 13th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 14(1), pp. 28–30. ACM, New York (1982)
+  * This paper attempts to focus attention on the problem of providing meaningful and effective educational programs for precollege teachers.
 Deek, F. P. & Kimmel, H. (1999). Status of Computer Science Education in Secondary Schools: One State's Perspective. Computer Science Education, 9(2), 89-113. doi:10.1076/csed.9.2.89.3808
 DiSessa, A. (2001). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy, The MIT Press.
-Ebby, C. B. (2000). Learning to Teach Mathematics Differently: The Interaction Between Course work and Fieldwork for Preservice Teachers, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 69-97. ebby_2000.pdf
+Ebby, C. B. (2000). Learning to Teach Mathematics Differently: The Interaction Between Course work and Fieldwork for Preservice Teachers, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 69-97. {{:project:methods:ebby_2000.pdf}}
+  * This article explores the connections that 3 preservice elementary teachers made between their experiences as learners of mathematics in a masters-level university methods course and their experiences as teachers of mathematics in the fieldwork classroom.
 Ericson, B., Armoni, M., Gal-Ezer, J. Seehorn, D.. Stephenson, C., & Trees, F (2008). Ensuring exemplary teaching in an essential discipline: Addressing the crisis in computer science teacher certification. New York: The Computer Science Teachers Association.
@@ Line 39: / Line 45: @@
 Fincher, S., & Petre, M. (2004). Computer science education research: Routledge.
+  * This book provides an overview of how to approach CS education research from a pragmatic perspective.
 Glass, R. L., Ramesh, V., and Vessey, I. 2004. An analysis of research in computing disciplines. Commun. ACM 47, 6 (Jun. 2004), 89-94. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/990680.990686
+  * Comparing the topics and methods of the three major subdivisions of the computing realm.
 Hazzan, O. (2003). How Students Attempt to Reduce Abstraction in the Learning of Mathematics and in the Learning of Computer Science. Computer Science Education, 13(2), 95-122. doi:10.1076/csed.13.2.95.14202
+  * The main section of the article analyzes the understanding of concepts from four fields - abstract algebra, computability, data structures and differential equations - through the lens of reducing abstraction. The analysis shows that a wide range of cognitive phenomena can be explained by one theoretical framework.
 Hazzan, O., Gal-Ezer, J., Blum, L. (2008) A model for high school Computer Science Education: The four key elements that make it! In: 39th Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 40(1), pp. 281–285. ACM, New York
+  * This paper presents a model program for high school computer science education. It is based on an analysis of the structure of the Israeli high school computer science curriculum considered to be one of the leading curricula worldwide.
 Holmboe, C. (2000). A framework for knowledge: Analysing high school students' understanding of data modelling. Paper presented at 12th Annual Workshop of Psychology of Programmers Interest Group (PPIG), Corigliano Calabro, Cosenza, Italy.
 Kinnunen, P. & Malmi, L. (2004). Do Students Work Efficiently in a Group? - Problem-Based Learning Groups in Basic Programming Course. In A. Korhonen & L. Malmi (Eds.) Kolin kolistelut - Koli Calling 2004. Proceedings of the Fourth Finnish/Baltic Sea Conference of Computer Science Education, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland, 57-66.
+Kölling, M. and Barnes, D. J. 2004. Enhancing apprentice-based learning of Java. In Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Norfolk, Virginia, USA, March 03 - 07, 2004). SIGCSE '04. ACM, New York, NY, 286-290. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/971300.971403 PDF: {{:project:methods:enhancing_apprentice_bluej.pdf|}}
 Lapidot, T. and Hazzan, O. (2004). Construction of a professional perception in the “Methods of Teaching Computer Science” course, Inroads, vol.36(2), pp. 57-61. Construction of professional perceptions
@@ Line 58: / Line 70: @@
 Pears, A., Seidman, S., Eney, C., Kinnunen, P., and Malmi, L. 2005. Constructing a core literature for computing education research. SIGCSE Bull. 37, 4 (Dec. 2005), 152-161. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1113847.1113893
-Ragonis, N. and Hazzan, O. (2008). Disciplinary-pedagogical teacher preparation for pre-service Computer Science teachers: rational and implementation, Informatics in Secondary Schools - Evolution and Perspective - ISSEP 2008, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5090/2008, pp. 253-264. ragonis_hazzan_issep_08.pdf
+Ragonis, N. and Hazzan, O. (2008). Disciplinary-pedagogical teacher preparation for pre-service Computer Science teachers: rational and implementation, Informatics in Secondary Schools - Evolution and Perspective - ISSEP 2008, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5090/2008, pp. 253-264. {{:project:methods:ragonis_hazzan_issep_08.pdf}}
 R. E. Mayer, (1988). Teaching and Learning Computer Programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
@@ Line 68: / Line 80: @@
 Wu, C. 1993 Conceptual Models and Individual Cognitive Learning Styles in Teaching Recursion to Novices. Doctoral Thesis. UMI Order Number: UMI Order No. GAX93-23595., University of Texas at Austin.
+Wulf, T. 2005. Constructivist approaches for teaching computer programming. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on information Technology Education (Newark, NJ, USA, October 20 - 22, 2005). SIGITE '05. ACM, New York, NY, 245-248. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1095714.1095771
 ===== Educational Theory & Teacher Education =====

Computer Science for Education

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools