User Tools

Site Tools


ci2010:team3:intellectual_property

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
ci2010:team3:intellectual_property [2010/02/22 15:22]
bdonovan
ci2010:team3:intellectual_property [2010/02/24 15:13] (current)
bdonovan
Line 23: Line 23:
 ====== Specific Cases in Intellectual Property ====== ====== Specific Cases in Intellectual Property ======
  
-*The Pirate Bay is a website that lists torrents, which allow users to find content and download it from other users. ​ The underlying technology is not illegal, but it is often used in violation of copyright law, since people use it to download music and movies. ​ In April 2009, the two owners of this website were convicted of ‘assisting in making copyright content available.’ ​ They recieved a year in jail and almost a million dollar fine apiece. +  ​ The Pirate Bay is a website that lists torrents, which allow users to find content and download it from other users. ​ The underlying technology is not illegal, but it is often used in violation of copyright law, since people use it to download music and movies. ​ In April 2009, the two owners of this website were convicted of ‘assisting in making copyright content available.’ ​ They recieved a year in jail and almost a million dollar fine apiece.((http://​torrentfreak.com/​investigation-on-leaked-pirate-bay-verdict-closes-100219/​))
-http://​torrentfreak.com/​investigation-on-leaked-pirate-bay-verdict-closes-100219/​+
  
 +  *  In 1994, the supreme court ruled that a parody of another work did not infringe on copyright law.  This issue was brought up when Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. sued the members of a rap group, 2 Live Crew, on the grounds that they had infringed on "Oh Pretty Woman,"​ a song by Roy Orbison. ​ This ruling was important because it created a less stringent definition of fair use.((http://​www.law.cornell.edu/​supct/​html/​92-1292.ZS.html))
  
-====== Further resources ====== +  *  In 2009, a man named Robert LHenderson received two years in prison for sneaking a video camera into a showing of The Dark Night This shows that the recording of this movie is considered to be intellectual theft from the owners of the movie.((http://www.zeropaid.com/news/88135/missouri-man-gets-2yr-prison-term-for-dark-knight-cam/))
- +
-http://www.hg.org/intell.html +
-http://www.caslon.com.au/ipguide5.htm +
-http://​www.alllaw.com/topics/intellectual_property/+
  
ci2010/team3/intellectual_property.1266870120.txt.gz · Last modified: 2010/02/22 15:22 by bdonovan